The classic Hollywood epic, Ben-Hur, was remade (again) and released this weekend. Starring Jack Huston and produced with a $100 million budget, this latest version was predicted to score a box office return of at least $12 million for its opening weekend. Up to the minute, actual returns are closer to $4 million.
Quick History Lesson
The original tale, titled Ben-Hur: A Tale of the Christ was written by Lew Wallace and published way back in 1880 (that’s CE, if you’re into history like me). One film version was made in 1925 (CE, again) and was itself a huge undertaking at the time. The more well-known version starring Charlton Heston was released in 1959 (I think you know which suffix to add here by now).
The story is a work of fiction but with a biblical setting as the backdrop. Christian elements dominate the story, with Ben-Hur’s life closely following that of Jesus. Underneath it all, themes like betrayal, revenge, and love drive the plot.
The Bad News
MGM was the studio in charge of the 1959 version and is responsible for 80% of this new version. Given their success with the 1959 version (considered by many to be one of the greatest movies ever made) and the public’s love for a good revenge story, you’d think all MGM had to do was tweak the original script a bit, update the special effects, find some decent actors, and then start cashing checks.
Keep it simple, stick with what works, right? Of course not.
Somehow, MGM has managed to take the original movie’s success and turn it around to create a career killer for everyone involved in this new version (except Morgan Freeman, because he’s God himself).
Despite having a great story with classic themes AND despite the recent success of many Christian based movies, the public still has not responded well.
MGM and Paramount have spent millions of marketing and advertising dollars pitching this the Christian community, who viewed the previews and clips on social media in large numbers. However, those viewers decided not to head to the box office.
As for the quality of the movie itself, the producers and film runners decided to focus more on the Jesus Christ aspect of the story than the 1959 version did. They chose to end it on a somewhat brighter note than the 1959 version, focusing more on forgiveness than vengeance.
Also, with this latest version running almost 90 minutes shorter, character development and aspects of the plot had to be sacrificed.
The Verdict
The only definitive thing about Ben-Hur (2016) is this: it exists.
MGM and Paramount can try to spin it as a Christian movie. They can say it’s an update for a modern audience. They can TRY to say that it can’t be compared to the 1959 version. But, the fact of the matter is this, it was made. No one knows why. No one cares. This is clearly being shown at the box office.
If you’ve seen this version or plan on seeing it, let me know.
Incidentally, this is the cleaned-up review of what I actually think about this movie. Leave a comment if you’re interested in a “no-holds-barred” discussion on Ben-Hur (2016), the current state of Hollywood, and the movie biz itself.











Recent Comments